Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 24.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Biol. 2011 Dec 22;22(2):93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.002

Figure 4. Optical manipulation of targeted network components with NpHR reveals changes in functional connectivity between ipsilateral neurons during development.

Figure 4

(A,B) Single cell optical manipulation of spontaneous activity with NpHR at 18 hpf (A) and 20 hpf (B). 593nm light at 19mW/mm2 is targeted successively to two regions outlined in yellow (A1, left), while calcium population activity is simultaneously recorded (A1, right) in the illuminated cells (red) and in the other ipsilateral cells (teal), and here displayed as normalized traces (standard deviation, s.d.) with regions indicated on y-axis. (A1) At 18 hpf, application of yellow light to a single cell (during yellow highlight bar) inhibits only the illuminated cell, while other cells remain active. (A2) Pooled results (n=6 embryos) show inhibition during light-ON and activation at light-OFF to be limited to illuminated cells (red bars). (B) At 20 hpf, single cell illumination has no effect on activity of either the illuminated or non-illuminated cells (n=7 embryos). (C) At 20 hpf, illumination of one side of spinal cord in region spanning two somites (yellow outline in image, left) inhibits and rebound excites both the illuminated cells and other ipsilateral cells (n=7 embryos). (D) Reduction of activity and rebound due to NpHR activation at 20 hpf are observed in cells that are both rostral and caudal to the region illuminated. (E) Control application of light aimed to the side of the cord but within the embryo (C1) does not perturb activity (n=7 embryos), indicating that effect on un-illuminated ipsilateral cells is not due to light scattering though we acknowledge light scattering may have different properties in this region. Rostral, up in fluorescence images; * P<0.05; ** P<0.01, paired Student’s t test. See also Supplemental Figs. 4 and 5.