Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2011 Dec 25;15(2):321–327. doi: 10.1038/nn.3001

Figure 5. Spatial relationship of function with connection strength to the highest predictors.

Figure 5

(a) Functional activation of an example participant, with the thresholded boundaries of inferotemporal connectivity overlaid in dark red, and boundaries of lingual connectivity overlaid in dark blue. (b) Each participant’s center-of-mass of connectivity to inferotemporal is plotted against their center-of-mass of positively-responding voxels, along the medial-lateral dimension, along which each participant’s connectivity varies alongside face-selectivity. (c) Centroids of lingual connectivity, plotted against centroids of negatively-responding voxels, along the anterior-posterior dimension. Solid lines in b and c are the least-square fits of these data, and dashed lines are their 99% confidence intervals.