Table 2.
Comparison with various studies
| S. No. | Authors | Year | Results (Pg:Pgs) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bell and Dann | 1973 | 1 : 0.60 |
| 2 | Mc Donnell et al. | 1977 | 1 : 0.75 |
| 3 | Busquets and Sassouni | 1981 | 1 : 0.80 |
| 4 | Gallagher d. M et al. | 1984 | 1 : 0.87 |
| 5 | Tulsane | 1987 | 1 : 0.73 |
| 6 | Park et al. | 1989 | 1 : 0.94 |
| 7 | Polido et al. | 1991 | 1 : 0.88 |
| 8 | De Freitas et al. | 1992 | 1 : 0.90 |
| 9 | Kremanov and Kahnberg | 1992 | 1 : 0.93 |
| 10 | Polido and Bell | 1993 | 1 : 0.83 |
| 11 | Van Sickels et al. | 1994 | 1 : 0.92 |
| 12 | Talebzadeh and Pogrel | 2001 | 1 : 0.75 |
| 13 | Veltkamp et al. | 2002 | 1 : 0.92 |
| 14 | Shaughnessy et al. | 2006 | 1 : 0.89 |
| 15 | Present study | 2009 | 1 : 0.89 |