Table 2.
Comparison with various studies
S. No. | Authors | Year | Results (Pg:Pgs) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bell and Dann | 1973 | 1 : 0.60 |
2 | Mc Donnell et al. | 1977 | 1 : 0.75 |
3 | Busquets and Sassouni | 1981 | 1 : 0.80 |
4 | Gallagher d. M et al. | 1984 | 1 : 0.87 |
5 | Tulsane | 1987 | 1 : 0.73 |
6 | Park et al. | 1989 | 1 : 0.94 |
7 | Polido et al. | 1991 | 1 : 0.88 |
8 | De Freitas et al. | 1992 | 1 : 0.90 |
9 | Kremanov and Kahnberg | 1992 | 1 : 0.93 |
10 | Polido and Bell | 1993 | 1 : 0.83 |
11 | Van Sickels et al. | 1994 | 1 : 0.92 |
12 | Talebzadeh and Pogrel | 2001 | 1 : 0.75 |
13 | Veltkamp et al. | 2002 | 1 : 0.92 |
14 | Shaughnessy et al. | 2006 | 1 : 0.89 |
15 | Present study | 2009 | 1 : 0.89 |