. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 29.

Published in final edited form as: Eur J Epidemiol. 2009 May 2;24(6):307–314. doi: 10.1007/s10654-009-9343-x

Table 1. AGES – Reykjavik participants by glycemic status and family history of diabetes.

Glycemic status	mean age	% (n) in groups	% family history of T2DM	% (n) in groups
Glycemic status	both genders	both genders	% family history of T2DM	men (n)	women (n)

Normoglycemic	76 ± 6	75.3 (1695)	19.3	70.6 (675)	78.8 (1022)
IFG	76 ± 6	13.9 (313)	19.3	15.1 (144)	13.1 (169)
Total T2DM	76 ± 5	10.8 (243)	39.5	14.3 (137)	8.2 (106)
(uT2DM)	77 ± 5	3.1 (69)	40.6	4.0 (38)	2.4 (31)
(dT2DM)	76 ± 5	7.7 (174)	39.1	10.4 (99)	5.8 (75)

Total number		2251		956	1295

The study cohort divided by glycemic status at the AGES-Reykjavik into subgroups, as well as by gender.

Total T2DM is also shown divided into diagnosed (dT2DM) and undiagnosed (uT2DM) groups.

The age is given in years ± SD and the % reporting family history of T2DM for both genders.