Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 30;12:639. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-639

Table 1.

Disambiguated INV and MDP inconsistencies

Code Test Supported draft
INV_1_24 FISH/int UMD (85%)
INV_1_53.3 FISH/int UMD (94%)
INV_4_7.2 FISH/int UMD (90%)
INV_7_103.2 FISH/int UMD (96%)
INV_10_59.3 FISH/int UMD (95%)
INV_14_32 FISH/int UMD (73%)
INV_20_0 FISH/int UMD (98%)
INV_23_0 FISH/met. UMD
INV_26_18.8 FISH/int UMD (75%)
INV_27_42.3 FISH/int UMD (90%)

MDP_4_16.2 FISH/int Btau (98%)
MDP_5_9.6 FISH/met. UMD
MDP_7_7.6 PCR UMD
MDP_7_43.1 PCR -
MDP_28_0.7 PCR UMD

DCM_2-11 FISH/met UMD
DCM_3-13 FISH/met Btau
DCM_3-2 FISH/met UMD
DCM_3-22 FISH/met UMD
DCM_7-X FISH/met UMD
DCM_10-1 FISH/met UMD
DCM_10-4 FISH/met UMD
DCM_15-X FISH/met UMD
DCM_27-21 FISH/met Btau

INV, MDP, or DCM inconsistencies (first column) disambiguated using the method reported in the second column: FISH on interphase nuclei (FISH/int), FISH on metaphases (FISH/met), or PCR. The third column indicates the draft [UMD, Btau, or neither of them (-)] which is in agreement with the experimental results. In the case of FISH performed in interphase nuclei, the round bracket reports the percentage in which the pattern of signals support the draft reported on the left of the brackets. In all cases p(H0) was < 0.0004%.