Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan;165(2):345–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01618.x

Table 4.

Pharmacogenomics of small molecules used for cancer therapy. The influence of drug uptake and efflux transporters on pharmacokinetics (PK) and/or pharmacodynamics (PD) are shown

Drug Transporter (gene) Genotype/polymorphism Effect on PK Effect on PD (outcome, toxicity) Reference
Erlotinib BCRP (ABCG2) c.421C>A Clearance reduced by 24% (head and neck squamous cell carcinoma) (Thomas et al., 2009)
c.1143/−15622 diplotypes (CC/TT) or (TT/TT) Higher AUC and Cmax (non-small-cell lung cancer, head and neck cancer, and ovarian cancer) No influence on diarhea or skin toxicity (Rudin et al., 2008)
P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) c.2677G>T/A No influence on pharmacokinetics (head and neck squamous cell carcinoma) (Thomas et al., 2009)
c.3435C>T No influence on pharmacokinetics (head and neck squamous cell carcinoma) (Thomas et al., 2009)
Gefitinib BCRP (ABCG2) c.421C>A Trend to higher Css, min (n.s., trough concentrations at steady state; malignant solid tumours) (Li et al., 2007)
c.421C>A Increased drug accumulation (ratio of trough concentrations at steady state to day 1 trough concentration; malignant solid tumours) (Li et al., 2007)
c.421C>A Increased risk of diarrhea (non-small-cell lung cancer) (Cusatis et al., 2006)
c.421C>A No influence on risk of skin toxicity (non-small-cell lung cancer) (Cusatis et al., 2006)
c.421C>A No effect on adverse side effects for example, diarrhea, interstitial pneumonia (non-small-cell lung cancer) (Akasaka et al., 2010)
−15622TT Increased risk of diarrhea (non-small-cell lung cancer) (Lemos et al., 2011)
haplotype TT (c.1143C>T, −15622C>T) Increased risk of higher grade diarrhea (non-small-cell lung cancer) (Lemos et al., 2011)
P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) c.3435C>T No influence on pharmacokinetics (Li et al., 2007)
c.3435C>T No influence on risk of diarrhea (non-small-cell lung cancer) (Cusatis et al., 2006)
c.3435C>T No influence on risk of skin toxicity (non-small-cell lung cancer) (Cusatis et al., 2006)
Imatinib OATP1A2 (SLCO1A2) −361GG Reduced imatinib clearance (CML) (Yamakawa et al., 2011)
OATP1B3 (SLCO1B3) c.334T>G No influence on plasma trough concentrations (CML) Higher rates of major molecular response (CML) (Takahashi et al., 2010)
c.334T>G Higher intracellular concentrations of imatinib in leukocytes (chronic phase CML) (Nambu et al., 2011)
c.334T>G Higher intracellular (leukocytes) to plasma ratio of imatinib (chronic phase CML) (Nambu et al., 2011)
OCT1 (SLC22A1) c.156T>C No influence on plasma trough concentrations (CML) No influence on major molecular response (CML) (Takahashi et al., 2010)
c.286C>T No change in oral imatinib clearance (Hu et al., 2008)
c.480GG Increased risk for imatinib resistance due to loss of response and treatment failure (CML) (Kim et al., 2009)
c.480C>G No influence on plasma trough concentrations (CML) No influence on major molecular response (CML) (Takahashi et al., 2010)
c.1022C>T No influence on plasma trough concentrations (CML) No influence on major molecular response (CML) (Takahashi et al., 2010)
c.1222GG No influence on plasma trough concentrations (CML) Higher rates of major molecular response (CML) (Takahashi et al., 2010)
c.1498C>A No change in oral imatinib clearance (Hu et al., 2008)
BCRP (ABCG2) c.34GG Decreased major and complete cytogenetic response (CML) (Kim et al., 2009)
c.421CC Decreased complete molecular response (CML) (Kim et al., 2009)
c.421C>A No influence on oral clearance (GIST) (Gardner et al., 2006)
c.421C>A Increased plasma trough concentrations (CML) No influence on major molecular response (CML) (Takahashi et al., 2010)
P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) c.3435TT Decreased overall survival (univariate analysis, CML) (Kim et al., 2009)
c.3435C>T No influence on the oral clearance (GIST) (Gardner et al., 2006)
c.1236TT; c.2677TT; c.3435TT Increased oral clearance (GIST) (Gurney et al., 2007)
c.1236C>T Higher major molecular response (CML) (Dulucq et al., 2008)
c.1236C>T Higher imatinib trough concentrations (CML) (Dulucq et al., 2008)
c.1236TT Increased resistance [cytogenetic resistance or relapse after major cytogenetic response (MCyR, CML)] (Ni et al., 2011)
c.1236C>T No influence on plasma trough concentrations (CML) No influence on major molecular response (CML) (Takahashi et al., 2010)
c.2677TT / TA Higher major molecular response (CML) (Dulucq et al., 2008)
c.2677GT Increased resistance (cytogenetic resistance or relapse after MCyR) (Ni et al., 2011)
c.2677G>T/A No influence on plasma trough concentrations (CML) No influence on major molecular response (CML) (Takahashi et al., 2010)
c.2677AG / AT / AA Lower resistance (cytogenetic resistance or relapse after MCyR) (Ni et al., 2011)
c.3435CC Lower resistance (cytogenetic resistance or relapse after MCyR) (Ni et al., 2011)
c.3435C>T No influence on plasma trough concentrations (CML) No influence on major molecular response (CML) (Takahashi et al., 2010)
haplotype TC or TT (c.1236C>T; c.3435C>T Higher imatinib trough concentrations (CML) (Dulucq et al., 2008)
c.1236C; c.2677G; c.3435C Lower major molecular response (CML) (Dulucq et al., 2008)
MRP2 (ABCC2) −24C>T No influence on plasma trough concentrations (CML) No influence on major molecular response (CML) (Takahashi et al., 2010)
Sunitinib BCRP (ABCG2) c.34G>A Trend for increased progression free survival (n.s., clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma) (van der Veldt et al., 2011)
422AA Higher blood concentrations (renal cell carcinoma) (Mizuno et al., 2010)
haplotype TT; −15622C>T, c.1143C>T Increased risk for toxicity (>grade 2 CTCAE, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, GIST) (van Erp et al., 2009a)
P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) haplotype TCG (c.3435C>T; c.1236C>T; c.2677G>T) Increased progression free survival (clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma) (van der Veldt et al., 2011)
haplotype TTT (c.1236C>T, c.2677G>T, c.3435C>T) Increased risk for hand-foot syndrome (metastatic renal cell carcinoma, GIST) (van Erp et al., 2009a)

GIST, gastrointestinal stromal tumours.