Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 13;367(1896):2399–2421. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0287

Table 2.

(a) Summary of the ABFs and the PERs for the pairwise model comparison. (b) Behavioural data as recorded during the fMRI experiment. (There was a significant (F3,76=16.91; p<0.05) difference in the word production rate between the four fluency conditions (given as mean±s.d.).) (c) Overview of the coupling parameters obtained from fitting the dynamic causal models to the empirical fMRI data. (The shown values represent the mean±s.d. across subjects.)

(a) Bayesian model comparison results
1 versus 2 1 versus 3 1 versus 4 2 versus 3 2 versus 4 3 versus 4
ABF 113,372565 1005,67775 194,488871 605,4330648 100,0601845 0,20815038
PER 11 : 1 19 : 0 19 : 0 18 : 1 18 : 2 3 : 16
(b) behavioural measurements
average number of words produced
 semantic syntactic phonological free
 48.65±5.77 42.7±8.07 46.7±7.52 56.85±3.6
(c) coupling parameters
driving input into BA 44 by context (condition)
 semantic syntactic phonological free
 0.56±0.41 0.61±0.56 0.58±0.44 0.52±0.38
intrinsic (context-independent) coupling
 BA 44→insula insula→caudate insula→cerebellum caudate→PMC cerebellum→PMC PMC→M1
 0.64±0.35 0.61±0.25 0.56±0.19 0.47±0.23 0.46±0.21 0.56±0.17
modulatory effects of verbal fluency
 BA 44→ insula insula→caudate insula→cerebellum caudate→PMC cerebellum→PMC PMC→M1
 0.148±0.10 0.149±0.08 0.138±0.08 0.120±0.07 0.117±0.06 0.139±0.06