Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 12;2:44. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2011.00044

Table 1.

Most likely position, test statistic values and estimated effects of parent-of-origin QTL for growth and beef carcass traits that were detected with at least 5% chromosome-wise evidence for linkage.

Traita BTA cMb −logPc P valued QTL typee Effect ± SEf % σp2g Bracketing markers (cM)
BWT, kg 3 125 4.9 0.431 Mat-i 0.31 ± 0.46 3.8 BM2924 (113)–RM309 (128)
2.06 ± 0.44
6 0 3.9 0.026 Pat 1.88 ± 0.49 2.5 ILSTS90 (0)–TEXAN24 (5)
8 30 4.2 0.319 Partial-i 0.87 ± 0.53 4.9 BM3419 (21)–BM310 (31)–TGLA10 (33)
0.80 ± 0.51
−1.64 ± 0.50
0.15 ± 0.49
−0.10 ± 0.92
3.05 ± 0.84
9 0 4.4 0.308 Partial-i −0.13 ± 0.43 5.1 BMS2151 (0)–BM757 (1)–ETH225 (8)
1.11 ± 0.42
−0.93 ± 0.41
1.14 ± 0.41
0.20 ± 0.72
1.66 ± 0.69
18 91 2.9 0.271 Mat −1.11 ± 0.34 1.8 EAC (82)–TGLA227 (92)
WWT, kg 2 2 2.3 0.602 Mat 4.67 ± 1.65 1.5 TGLA44 (0)–BM3627 (6)
11 75 3.3 0.095 Mat −8.50 ± 2.42 2.2 BM6445 (53)–BM746 (88)
YWT, kg 2 3 2.5 0.403 Mat 6.06 ± 2.03 1.6 BY42 (2)–BM3627 (6)
5 64 2.3 0.629 Pat −6.11 ± 2.19 1.4 CSSM22 (59)–IGF1 (62)–TEXAN15 (69)
SWT, kg 2 3 4.2 0.059 Mat 12.44 ± 3.11 3.1 BM81124 (1)–BY42 (2)–BM3627 (6)
4 65 2.9 0.502 Mat 11.94 ± 3.71 2.0 BM1224 (54)–BM6458 (65)
12 74 2.1 0.619 Pat −9.57 ± 3.62 1.4 BM4028 (70)–EAB (73)–ILSTS33 (87)
13 64 4.2 0.049 Mat 12.85 ± 3.18 3.1 TGLA381 (60)–RM327 (72)
25 11 2.4 0.890 Mat-i −14.34 ± 4.30 2.2 BMC4216 (0)–BM4005 (16)
6.83 ± 4.30
HCW, kg 2 6 3.8 0.050 Mat 8.09 ± 2.12 2.8 BY42 (2)–BM3627 (6)–TGLA431 (9)
4 65 2.9 0.341 Mat 8.12 ± 2.50 2.0 BM6458 (65)–TEXAN28 (78)
5 71 2.9 0.427 Partial −2.53 ± 2.32 3.0 TEXAN15 (69)–RM29 (71)–BM1819 (72)
4.73 ± 2.32
9.81 ± 2.32
25 7 2.6 0.696 Mat-i −10.62 ± 3.05 2.3 BMC4216 (0)–BM4005 (16)
4.98 ± 3.00
ABF, mm 1 48 2.5 0.247 Mat 0.79 ± 0.27 1.7 BM4307 (37)–TGLA57 (49)
3 62 2.2 0.489 Pat 0.90 ± 0.33 1.5 INRA3 (54)–HUJ246 (65)
7 5 2.3 0.536 Pat 0.90 ± 0.32 1.5 BM7160 (0)–RM12 (10)
20 56 2.7 0.369 Mat 0.82 ± 0.26 1.9 BM4107 (53)–BM5004 (73)
KPH, % 2 57 4.2 0.023 Pat −0.14 ± 0.03 3.1 BM4440 (57)–NPY3R (58)–TEXAN8 (60)
11 46 2.5 0.506 Mat 0.10 ± 0.04 1.7 TGLA327 (44)–CSSM16 (47)

aBWT, birth weight; WWT, weaning weight; YWT, yearling weight; SWT, slaughter weight; HCWT, hot carcass weight; ABF, adjusted subcutaneous fat thickness between the 12th and 13th ribs; KPH, percentage of kidney, pelvic, and heart fat relative to carcass weight.

bLocation at which the test statistic was maximized.

cNegative logarithm of the comparison-wise P-value of the test statistic against the null hypothesis of no QTL at the most likely position for the inferred QTL model.

dP-values are genome-wide levels of evidence for linkage.

eDetected QTL type: Pat, QTL with paternal expression; Mat, QTL with maternal expression; Partial, parent-of-origin QTL with expression of both parental alleles. For gender–QTL interaction analysis, -i indicates significance of the gender interaction term with the assumption of different effects for the two breed alleles.

fEstimates of paternal and maternal effects for Pat and Mat QTL, respectively, and of paternal, maternal, and dominance effects for partial QTL. For the gender-specific QTL, the estimates of the declared POE effect are in the order of male (regular font) and female (italic font) effects.

gProportion of phenotypic variance due to the QTL, [100* (1−(residual SS under Ha/residual SS under Ho)*(dfHo/dfHa)], where dfHo and dfHa are degree of freedoms corresponding to the residuals under the Ho (no QTL) and Ha models, respectively.