Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Proteome Res. 2011 Mar 24;10(5):2671–2678. doi: 10.1021/pr1012619

Table 1. K-S test evaluations of the calibration of different score functions.

Here, we report the D values from K-S tests performed on nearly 30,000 entrapment PSMs from the concatenated runs of ISB18 mix Orbitrap spectra searched through two different bipartite databases. In the first experiment, we used a shuffled entrapment database; in the second, we used an entrapment database of H. influenzae sequences.

Method Shuffled entrapment
K-S D value
H. influenzae entrapment
K-S D value
Separate target-decoy analysis, XCorr 0.028 0.028
Target-decoy competition, XCorr 0.011 0.013
Percolator 1.14, without intraset features 0.026 0.035
Percolator 1.03, with intraset features 0.087 0.116
X!Tandem 0.747 0.738
MS-GFDB 0.210 0.225