Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011 Dec 5;42(2):179–190. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.10.014

Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics and Intercorrelations among Study Variables

M SD ICC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Staff Levela
 1. IA 33.29 7.15 .15 .81
 2. GR 35.70 7.12 .17 .35** .74
 3. EF 40.22 5.15 .26 .38** .39** .72
 4. AD 37.78 5.58 .06 .33** .37** .49** .67
 5. IN 35.75 6.66 .10 .44** .37** .32** .28** .81
Program Levelb
 6. L 37.92 4.05 .21 .21** .37** .18** .14** .21** .92
 7. CL 35.87 3.19 .13 .23** .38** .24** .15** .23* .66** .91

IA = Innovation Adoption, GR = Growth, EF = Efficacy, AD = Adaptability, IN = Influence, L = Leadership

CL = Climate, ICC = intraclass correlation

Note: The values on the diagonal shown in bold are the internal reliabilities.

a

N = 421

b

N = 71

*

p< .05;

**

p< .01