Table 2.
Models | Coefficient (SE)
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Base Rate (γ00) | Leadership (γ01) | Staff Attribute (γ10) | Experience (γ20) | Master’s (γ30) | Certification (γ40) | Caseload (γ50) | |
Hypothesis 1: Relationship of Staff | |||||||
Attribute to Innovation Adoption | |||||||
Model 1a: GR (γ10) | 33.46 (.39)** | -- | .34 (.05)** | 1.70 (.51)** | 2.12 (.64)** | .97 (.71) | 1.32 (.43)** |
Model 2a: EF (γ10) | 33.30 (.39)** | -- | .41 (.08)** | 1.49 (.53)* | 1.45 (.66)* | 1.00 (.74) | 1.26 (.44)** |
Model 3a: AD (γ10) | 33.40 (.40)** | -- | .40 (.09)** | 1.95 (.51)** | 2.05 (.65)** | 1.30 (.72) | 1.38 (.43)** |
Model 4a: IN (γ10) | 33.18 (.40)** | -- | .40 (.05)** | 1.10 (.51)* | 1.82 (.65)** | .44 (.73) | 1.09 (.43)* |
Hypothesis 2: Relationship of Leadership to Innovation Adoption | |||||||
Model 5a | 33.32 (.43)** | .39 (.10)** | -- | 1.55 (.54)** | 2.28 (.68)** | 1.36 (.77) | 1.39 (.46)** |
Hypothesis 3: Relationship of Leadership to Staff Attribute | |||||||
Model 6: GR (Y) | 35.54 (.35)** | .65 (.09)** | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Model 7: EF (Y) | 40.40 (.36)** | .36 (.08)** | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Model 8: AD (Y) | 37.72 (.29)** | .25 (.07)* | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Model 9: IN (Y) | 35.9 (.37)** | .35 (.08)** | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Hypothesis 4: Mediation of Leadership-Innovation Adoption by Staff Attribute | |||||||
Model 10a: GR (γ10) | 33.46 (.39)** | .14 (.09) | .32 (.06)** | 1.69 (.51)** | 2.12 (.64)** | 1.00 (.71) | 1.34 (.43)** |
Model 11a: EF (γ10) | 33.29 (.38)** | .23 (.09)* | .38 (.08)** | 1.21 (.53)* | 1.48 (.66)* | 1.01 (.73) | 1.34 (.44)** |
Model 12a: AD (γ10) | 33.35 (.39)** | .27 (.09)** | .39 (.06)** | 1.94 (.51)** | 2.01 (.64)** | 1.34 (.72) | 1.46 (.43)** |
Model 13a: IN (γ10) | 33.20 (.39)** | .26 (.09)** | .37 (.05)** | 1.14 (.51)* | 1.77 (.64)** | .44 (.73) | 1.16 (.43)** |
GR = Growth, EF = Efficacy, AD = Adaptability, IN = Influence
Note: Y = outcome variable, γ00 = base rate of dependent measure
controlling for experience, Master’s degree, certification, and caseload
p< .05;
p< .01