Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011 Dec 5;42(2):179–190. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.10.014

Table 3.

HLM Results for Test of Moderation

Models Coefficient (SE)
Base Rate (γ00) Leadership (γ01) Climate (γ02) L X CL (γ03) Experience (γ10) Master’s (γ20) Certification (γ30)
Hypothesis 5: Moderator Effect of Climate on Leadership-Staff Attribute
Model 14: GR (Y) 35.43 (.37)** .41 (.11)** .65 (.17)** .02 (.02) -- -- --
Model 15a: EF (Y) 40.63 (.37)** .18 (.11) .30 (.15) -.03 (.02) 1.14 (.39)** 2.04 (.49)** .32 (.56)
Model 16: AD (Y) 37.84 (.33)** .18 (.10) .13 (.14) -.01 (.01) -- -- --
Model 17a: IN (Y) 35.70 (.40)** .21 (.12) .41 (.17)* .03 (.02) 1.23 (.52)* 1.37 (.64)* 2.35 (.74)**

GR = Growth, EF = Efficacy, AD = Adaptability, IN = Influence, L = Leadership, CL = Climate

Note: Y = outcome variable, γ00 = base rate of dependent measure

a

controlling for experience, Master’s degree, and certification

*

p< .05;

**

p< .01