Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011 Dec 3;42(2):213–221. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.10.012

Table 2.

Organization-, Treatment Unit-, and Staff-Level Predictors of CM Adoption Attitudes

Variable β SE 95% CI p
Intercept 7.225 0.507 6.21 – 8.24 <0.0001
Organization-Level
None
Treatment Unit-Level
Opiate Agonist Services 0.363 0.141 0.09 – 0.64 0.0101
National Accreditation −0.381 0.146 −0.67 – −0.09 0.0091
Organizational stress −0.040 0.014 −0.07 – −0.01 0.0047
Staff-Level
Position 0.0711
 Management vs. Clinical 0.316 0.138 0.05 – 0.59 0.0218
 Management vs. Support 0.260 0.153 0.04 – 0.56 0.0891
Tenure 0.045 0.008 0.03 – 0.06 <0.0001
Education (degree obtained) <0.0001
 Graduate vs. Bachelor/Associate 0.378 0.095 0.19 – 0.56 <0.0001
 Graduate vs. High School/Less 0.726 0.114 0.50 – 0.95 <0.0001
E-communication 0.154 0.044 0.07 – 0.24 0.0005
Openness to Change 0.079 0.043 −0.01 – 0.16 0.0674

Table Notes. All predictors as indicated in Table 1. SE=Standard error; CI=Confidence interval. Retained predictors were associated with CM adoption attitudes in both univariate analyses (p<.25) and multivariate modeling analyses (p<.10). For staff-level position, the reference group for the indicated analysis was management. For staff-level education, the reference group for the indicated analysis was graduate.