Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 26;40(1):73–84. doi: 10.1007/s10802-011-9544-0

Table 2.

Differences between conditions on self-rated thought content: raw means, standard deviations, and test statistics

Condition
RUM (N = 40) DIS (N = 40) POS (N = 41) ACC (N = 39) df = 3
Variable α M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) F χ²
Manipulation check rumination 0.64 76.18 (17.11) 65.60 (23.58) 57.51 (21.02) 57.30 (21.69) 7.20***
Manipulation check distancing N/a 37.95 (33.83) 68.33 (19.30) 33.29 (29.00) 33.62 (27.97) 33.98***
Manipulation check pos. reappraisal 0.78 44.19 (26.97) 37.59 (24.81) 65.99 (16.78) 43.80 (23.05) 32.96***
Manipulation check acceptance 0.48 63.19 (17.87) 62.51 (20.02) 63.89 (19.68) 61.79 (18.24) 0.09
Manipulation check reflection N/a 48.73 (30.57) 42.03 (24.73) 51.32 (23.00) 43.49 (24.91) 1.14
Self-rated severity of the event N/a 3.88 (0.82) 3.95 (0.99) 3.83 (0.92) 3.67 (0.90) 0.69
Thinking in words N/a 52.45 (36.50) 41.93 (27.96) 57.59 (33.46) 39.79 (32.29) 7.32
Thinking in images N/a 58.93 (35.58) 76.88 (23.28) 48.88 (32.51) 66.82 (28.05) 15.36**
Ratio words/images N/a 8.63 (23.14) 1.86 (7.83) 9.22 (23.12) 4.31 (16.55) 10.53*

***p ≤ 0.001, **p < 0.005, *p < 0.05 (ANOVAs for parametric data and Kruskal-Wallis tests for non-parametric data)