Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 28;22(Suppl 1):35–40. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr198

Table 3.

Indicators of less harmful cigarettes among smokers who believed that some cigarettes were less harmful than others

Germany (wave 1) n = 556 France (wave 1) n = 422 UK (wave 5) n = 385 Total n = 1363 OR [95% CI]
Variables % endorsed [n] % endorsed [n] % endorsed [n] % endorsed
Indicators of less harmful cigarettes
Tar/nicotine levels
    Overall 88.1 (489) 82.4 (348) 88.5 (340) 86.3
    UK vs. Germany .88 (.57 – 1.37)
    France vs. Germany .66*(.45 – .98)
Taste
    Overall 43.9 (244) 36.3 (153) 66.1 (254) 48.7
    UK vs. Germany 2.33***(1.74 – 3.12)
    France vs. Germany .67** (.50 – .88)
Smooth/Terms
    Overall 30.6b (170) 34.2a (144) 46.6a (179) 40.4
    UK vs. France 1.75*** (1.28 – 2.38)
Something else
    Overall 31.6 (174) 30.2 (128) 25.5 (97) 29.1
    UK vs. Germany .87 (.63 – 1.20)
    France vs. Germany 1.16 (.86 – 1.56)
Own brand a little less harmful
    Overall 28.2 (143) 24.1 (96) 40.8 (157) 30.7
    UK vs. Germany 1.99*** (1.46 – 2.72)
    France vs. Germany .89 (.64 – 1.23)

*P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001. All models include covariates of interest

a: smooth (or ultra) as an indicator of less harmful cigarette

b: terms (such as silver) as an indicator of less harmful cigarette