Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Brain Res. 2011 Mar 6;210(3-4):623–640. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2599-x

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Mean ± SD of error between model predictions and actual 3D axis of aVOR eye rotation response for all cases tested empirically and simulated. When the active/reference electrodes could not be discerned from each another with certainty due to twisting of paired wires and limits of CT resolution, both possible scenarios were simulated and included (▲). When only the electrode configurations that were most likely the actual arrangement based on operative notes and fits of the NM model are included, apparent errors are lower (○). *All electrode configurations were known for Ch050506A.