Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 3;11(1):M111.011486. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.011486

Table II. Effect of proteasome inhibitors on the digestion of the 31-mer substrate.

No Inhibitor MG-132 Epoxomicin
Amount digested 100% 28.9% 54.3%
N. of digestion products 80 28 16
Peptides involving dual cleavagea 66 (82.5%) 20 (71.4%) 7 (43.8%)
N. of cleaved peptide bondsb 29 (96.7%) 22 (73.3%) 19 (63.3%)
N. of productive species for the A68 ligandc 4 (5.1%) 2 (7.1%) 1 (6.3%)
Relative yield of productive cleavagesd 6.9% 5.5% 2.6%
N. of destructive cleavages for the A68 ligande 10 (34.5%) 8 (36.4%) 4 (21.1%)
Relative yield of the destructive cleavagesd 20.3% 26.3% 7.8%
N. of productive species for the B27 ligandc 12 (15.2%) 2 (7.1%) 2 (12.5%)
Relative yield of productive cleavagesd 28.2% 14.6% 17.0%
N. of destructive cleavages for the B27 ligande 9 (31%) 6 (27.3%) 7 (36.8%)
Relative yield of the destructive cleavagesd 25.9% 18.3% 45.8%
Destruction/production ratio for the A68 ligandf 2.9 4.8 3.0
Destruction/production ratio for the B27 ligandf 0.9 1.3 2.7

a Percent relative to the total number of digestion products.

b Percent relative to the total number of peptide bonds in the substrate.

c Peptides with the right C-terminus and right or extended N-terminus. Percent values are relative to the total number of digestion products (see Table VS).

d Added values from Table VIS. For productive cleavages the yields correspond to the relative contribution of cleavage after R17 or Y25 for the A68 and B27 ligands, respectively.

e Cleaved peptide bonds implying destruction of the epitope. Percent values are relative to the total number of cleaved peptide bonds.

f Ratio between the joint relative yield of cleavages implying destruction of the natural ligand and that of the potentially productive peptides.