Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 2;470(3):735–742. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2159-5

Table 3.

Representative literature review of distal femoral oncologic endoprosthetic survivorship

Study Number of patients available for review Stated implant type Survival (%) Aseptic failure (%) Septic failure (%) Failure due to local recurrence (%)
5-year 10-year 20-year
Unwin et al. [27] 493 CIS 90.1 67.4 9.1 1.8 6.5
Meyers et al. [19] 335 CIS 61.0 23.6 9.6 6.0
Jeys et al. [13] 228 CIS 52.7 30.5 13.6 12.7 5.3
Schwartz et al. [24] 186 CIS 77.0 58.0 11.8 3.7
Roberts et al. [22] 135 CIS 75.0
Bickels et al. [4] 110 CIS 93.0 88.0 5.4 4.5
Gosherger et al. [8] 103 CIS/UIS 65.9 14.6 11.7
Ahlmann et al. [1] 78 CIS 75.0 58.0 5.1 6.4 2.6
Torbert et al. [25] 57 CIS 84.0 66.0
Farfalli et al. [7] 50 UIS 85.0 71.0 24.0
Farfalli et al. [7] 41 CPS 88.0
Current study 26 CIS 66.6 7.7 11.5 7.7
Current study 26 CPS 83.5 3.8 11.5

CPS = Compress® Compliant Pre-Stress Implant; CIS = cemented intramedullary stem; UIS = uncemented intramedullary stem.