Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Oct 24;121(1):212–224. doi: 10.1037/a0025823

Table 10.

Predictive Value (% or ratio) of Different Deficit Profiles

Variable PA only PA L only L PS/NS only PS/NS Any Single 2–3 Deficits Any Deficit
CLDRC
     Sens 16.9 67.5 9.6 39.8 6.0 47.0 32.5 45.8 78.3
- - - - - - - - -
     Spec 97.2 95.0 95.7 93.3 96.5 94.1 89.4 96.9 86.3
99.0 98.2 96.4 95.3 97.7 96.6 93.1 98.5 91.7
     PPP 40.0 60.2 20.0 39.8 16.1 47.0 25.5 62.3 38.9
70.0 83.6 26.7 53.2 26.3 65.0 39.1 80.8 56.0
     NPP 91.3 96.3 90.5 93.3 90.2 94.1 92.2 94.1 97.3
89.8 95.7 88.7 92.1 88.4 93.1 91.1 93.1 96.9
ILTS
     Sens 15.9 41.5 2.4 19.5 22.0 42.7 40.2 28.0 68.3
- - - - - - - - -
     Spec 96.7 93.5 93.7 90.9 96.1 93.5 86.5 96.0 82.7
98.0 96.2 94.0 92.4 96.7 95.2 88.7 97.7 86.4
     PPP 35.1 42.7 4.2 19.5 39.1 42.7 25.2 44.2 30.8
52.0 59.6 5.3 25.8 47.4 54.7 32.7 62.1 40.6
     NPP 91.0 93.5 89.5 90.9 91.6 93.5 92.8 92.2 95.8
89.5 92.4 87.6 89.4 90.1 92.4 91.6 90.9 95.2

Note. CLDRC = Colorado Learning Disabilities Research Center; ILTS = International longitudinal Twin Study; Sens = Sensitivity; Spec = Specificity; PPP = Positive Predictive Power; NPP = Negative Predictive Power – all expressed as percentages. All subject are included in the first row of each variable, and borderline subjects have been removed from the second row.