Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Feb;35(3):478–485. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07960.x

Figure 2. Effect of movement preparation and movement onset on the amplitude of MEPAPB and MEPFDI.

Figure 2

MEPs are expressed as percentage of rest MEPs in the four different conditions (rest, T100, T50, Tpeak), in controls (black) and patients (grey), during single-pulse TMS. A: A significant decrease of MEPAPB was observed in controls at T50 and Tpeak (surround inhibition) while patients exhibited no significant surround inhibition. * p< 0.05. B: Significant MEPFDI amplitude increase was found in both groups at T50 and Tpeak (central excitation).