Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 2;3:3. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2012.00003

Table 1.

Clinical vs. experimental research: a comparison of methods.

Methods Use*
Type of information
Clinical Experimental Temporal Spatial Molecular Functional
IN VIVO IMAGING
CT 2685 150 Yes Yes No No
MRI 3595 435 Yes Yes Yes/no Yes
PET 230 37 Yes Yes Yes Yes/no
NEUROBEHAVIORAL ASSAYS
Injury severity 4983 705 Yes No No Yes
Neurobehavioral 289 140 Yes No No Yes
CEREBRAL MONITORING
ICP 1089 220 Yes No No Yes
CBF 1862 879 Yes No No Yes
TCD 301 19 Yes No No Yes
qEEG 2258 375 Yes Yes/no No Yes
BIOCHEMICAL ASSAYS
Blood/metabolites 46 42 Yes No Yes No
CSF/metabolites 25 5 Yes No Yes No
MD/metabolites 20 15 Yes Yes Yes No
Blood/protein biomarkers 291 203 Yes No Yes No
CSF/protein biomarkers 91 30 Yes No Yes No
MD/protein biomarkers 6 1 Yes Yes Yes No
IN VITRO ANALYSIS OF BRAIN TISSUE
Histopathology 7461 6005 No Yes No Yes/no
IHC 434 1862 No Yes Yes Yes/no
ISHH 36 392 No Yes Yes Yes/no
EM 144 509 No Yes Yes/no Yes/no
Genomics 45 47 No Yes Yes Yes/no
Proteomics 42 43 No Yes Yes Yes/no

*Use is defined as relative frequency of use based on the number of publications retrieved by searching PubMed using the search terms: “traumatic brain injury” in combination with the methods presented in the left column together with the limitation “animal” or “human.” The number of papers found is registered in the second and third columns on the left. CT, computer tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET, positron emission tomography; ICP, intracranial pressure; CBF, cerebral blood flow; TCD, transcranial Doppler; qEEG, quantitative electroencephalography; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; MD, microdialysate; IHC, immunohistochemistry; ISHH, in situ hybridization histochemistry; EM, electron microscopy.