Table 4.
Waist circumference classification according to gender and geographical location.
Subgroups | Waist circumference classification | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Urban | Rural farm | Rural desert | Total sample | |||||
Normal n = 383 | “At risk” n = 272 | Normal n = 248 | “At risk” n = 131 | “Normal” n = 92 | “At risk” n = 73 | Normal n = 723 | “At risk” n = 476 | |
Males | 75.3% | 24.7% | 79.7% | 20.3% | 70.2% | 29.8% | 73.5% | 26.5% |
Females | 49.5% | 50.5% | 49.2% | 50.8% | 40.7% | 59.3% | 45.8% | 54.2% |
Whole group | 58.5% | 41.5% | 65.4% | 34.6% | 55.8% | 44.2% | 60.3% | 39.7% |