Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 23;2012:417589. doi: 10.1155/2012/417589

Table 4.

Waist circumference classification according to gender and geographical location.

Subgroups Waist circumference classification
Urban Rural farm Rural desert Total sample
Normal n = 383 “At risk” n = 272 Normal n = 248 “At risk” n = 131 “Normal” n = 92 “At risk” n = 73 Normal n = 723 “At risk” n = 476
Males 75.3% 24.7% 79.7% 20.3% 70.2% 29.8% 73.5% 26.5%
Females 49.5% 50.5% 49.2% 50.8% 40.7% 59.3% 45.8% 54.2%
Whole group 58.5% 41.5% 65.4% 34.6% 55.8% 44.2% 60.3% 39.7%