Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 2;7(2):e30361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030361

Table 1. Predictive performance of Phi and Psi angles based on different local window sizes using the PSI-BLAST profile.

Torsion angles Local window size Number of features Number of support vectors CC RMSE MAE
Phi 3 60 69370 0.455 49.25 31.44
5 100 69358 0.478 48.57 30.44
7 140 69299 0.484 48.33 30.05
9 180 69285 0.486 48.24 29.92
11 220 69243 0.483 48.27 29.94
13 260 69343 0.478 48.42 30.04
15 300 69382 0.472 48.55 30.25
17 340 69350 0.466 48.73 30.46
19 380 69369 0.459 48.90 30.71
21 420 69344 0.451 49.13 30.99
Psi 3 60 69955 0.469 80.79 63.33
5 100 69923 0.537 76.85 58.84
7 140 69855 0.563 75.27 56.91
9 180 69712 0.575 74.55 55.96
11 220 69738 0.581 74.18 55.43
13 260 69718 0.581 74.24 55.38
15 300 69736 0.580 74.44 55.43
17 340 69724 0.577 74.70 55.68
19 380 69719 0.573 75.08 56.04
21 420 69665 0.569 75.43 56.41

The results were obtained using an independent test set of 1,026 proteins from the set of PDB data compiled by Wu and Zhang [11], where the rest 500 proteins were used for training.