Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Oct 26;139(1):19–37. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.09.014

Table 5.

Reliable parameters from Model 3 using the BIC model selection technique. Smaller and more negative values indicate that a letter was less perceivable, biased against, or that a letter combination was discriminated less well than was expected by the perceivability and bias alone. Baseline log-odds accuracy was 1.306 which is equivalent to a percent accuracy of 78.7, which was restricted to be the same across both experiments.

Letter Experiment 1 (“@”) Experiment 2 (“#”) Global Dissimilarity (δ) Experiment-specific Dissimilarity (δ)


Perceivability (λ) Bias (γ) Perceivability (λ) Bias (γ)
Intercept 1.306 1.306
A −0.571 B G −0.388 Experiment 1
B 0.227 C G −0.737 B Z 0.621
C −0.174 0.602 −0.206 C O −0.686 C D −0.638
D 0.208 0.155 C Q −0.540 D G −0.927
E C U −0.364 D O −0.597
F −0.153 D Z 0.349 D Q −0.849
G −0.230 E F −0.648 D U −0.618
H −0.612 H N −0.457 E I 0.475
I −0.273 −0.948 −0.346 I L −0.335 G Q −0.560
J −0.338 −0.242 −0.146 K M −0.345 G U −0.599
K K X −0.355 O U −0.522
L −0.164 −0.573 −0.191 M N −0.424 R Y −0.600
M 0.246 M W −0.468
N −0.118 N W −0.408 Experiment 2
O 0.672 −0.161 O Q −1.152 A V −0.551
P Q U −0.646 D L 0.653
Q X Y −0.342 E K −0.635
R 0.171 0.148 F T −0.497
S 0.258 −0.126 G L 0.482
T −0.382 −0.199 G X 0.473
U Differential Dissimilarity H W −0.494
V 0.422 A Q −0.472 L P 0.663
W −0.251 E N 0.360 L Q 0.621
X −0.25 −0.851 0.161 G P −0.413 Q R 0.470
Y 0.204 −0.626 I Z 0.379
Z U X −0.415