Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 3;7(2):e29906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029906

Table 2. Comparison of LC-MS analysis of the F16 sub-fractions obtained from the RP-HPLC and their effect on the A549 cell viability.

Fraction
control F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9 F10
Metabolites Relative LC-MS peak intensity
Tryptoquivaline F nd 42.0 100 6.7 nd nd nd nd
Fumiquinazoline C nd 31.3 100 8.3 4.2 nd nd nd
Fumagillin nd 97.5 100 93.1 nd nd nd
Trypacidin nd 100 8.8 3.0 nd nd
Monomethylsulochrin nd 100 40.9 2.3 nd nd
Questin nd 100 54.7 1.6 nd nd
Verruculogen nd nd 100 58.9 nd nd
Helvolic acid nd nd nd 100 nd nd
Fumitremorgin B nd nd nd 100 nd nd
Emodin nd nd nd nd nd nd
Fumigaclavine A nd nd nd nd nd nd
Unknown (m/z 453)* nd nd nd 60.3 100 48.1
cell viability (%) 92.5 80.7 79.0 77.2 35.5 48.7 47.0 47.1 70.4

Sub-fractionation of F16 fraction using RP-HPLC. F3 to F7 were each collected for 2 min, F8 for 5 min, F9 for 10 min and F10 for 6 min. Each fraction was evaporated and the dried material was dissolved in 50 µl PBS-DMSO 12%. The final concentration of DMSO in the assay medium was 1.2%. The cell viability was measured by the MTT assay described in the Materials and Methods after exposing A549 cells to the metabolites for 48 h. The effect of 1.2% DMSO was used as negative control. For each metabolite, the figures are arbitrary units indicating its elution profile, 100 corresponding to the maximum normalized level measured by the LC-MS sensor. nd means not detectable.

*m/z in positive mode electrospray ionization.