Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 3;7(2):e30711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030711

Figure 5. Exploratory analysis comparing different dose regimens.

Figure 5

For each of seven RAADP treatment regimens: elicited relative effectiveness compared to an optimally effective treatment (67% intervals pooled across assessors); observed odds ratios comparing RAADP to control (with 95% intervals), where available; and odds ratios expected in a future study comparing RAADP to control (with 95% intervals), obtained from a fitted meta-regression model. (Higher values for relative effectiveness compared to an optimal treatment correspond to lower odds ratios compared to control.).