Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 18;39(2):777–787. doi: 10.1118/1.3676688

Table 3.

Average DOI difference (standard deviation in mm) of the calibrated depths between different DOI calibration methods for each crystal surface and geometry tested.

  Without energy filter With energy filter
  Difference between different DOI calibration methods
Crystal type Collimated–internal Collimated–flood Flood–internal Collimated–internal Collimated–flood Flood–internal
1.5 × 20 mm rough cut 0.23 0.56 0.69 0.64 0.25 0.78
1.5 × 20 mm 30 μ finish 0.26 0.51 0.67 0.53 0.33 0.76
1.5 × 20 mm 12 μ finish 0.85 0.38 1.00 0.42 0.39 0.29
1.5 × 20 mm 9 μ finish 0.28 0.50 0.63 0.67 0.36 0.92
1.5 × 20 mm 5 μ finish 0.79 0.87 0.13 0.89 0.51 0.44
1.5 × 20 mm 0.5 μ finish 2.45 2.33 0.16 2.56 1.24 1.42
1.5 × 30 mm rough cut 0.25 0.54 0.72 0.55 0.26 0.70
1.5 × 20 mm 30 μ finish 0.30 0.56 0.78 0.30 0.28 0.48
1.5 × 20 mm 12 μ Finish 0.30 0.51 0.72 0.60 0.44 0.89
1.5 × 20 mm 9 μ finish 0.54 0.28 0.75 0.35 0.49 0.73
1.5 × 20 mm 5 μ finish 1.30 0.19 1.21 0.82 0.73 0.37
1.5 × 20 mm 0.5 μ finish 0.92 0.25 0.74 0.19 1.08 1.01
1.5 × 30 mm rough cut 0.53 0.33 0.75 0.35 0.38 0.62
2 × 30 mm rough cut 0.62 0.28 0.76 0.29 0.42 0.54
2 × 40 mm rough cut 0.74 0.69 0.45 1.09 0.35 1.22