Table 2.
Summary of recent studies examining the risk of manic/hypomanic switch following the use of antidepressants in the treatment of acute bipolar depression.
| Increased risk of switch | No increased risk of switch | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study | No. of participants | Drug | Comments | Study | No. of participants | Drug | Comments |
| Antidepressants as Monotherapy | |||||||
| Amsterdam and Shults 2005 [13] | 34 (BPI = 32, BPII = 2) | Fluoxetine, olanzapine/fluoxetine combination | No Placebo Control | ||||
| Parker et al. 2006 [16] | 10 BPII | Escitalopram | Small sample size | ||||
| Agosti and Stewart 2007 [21] | 70 BP II | Imipramine, phenelzine | No valid tool used to assess switch | ||||
| Amsterdam and Shults 2008 [17] | 83 BPII | Venlafaxine | Compared to Lithium, no placebo control | ||||
| McElroy et al. 2010 (EMBOLDEN II) [14] | 740 (BPI = 478, BPII = 262) | paroxetine | |||||
| Amsterdam and Shults 2010 [15] | 148 BPII | Fluoxetine | No placebo control, subsyndromal hypomania in 19.6% | ||||
|
| |||||||
| Antidepressants with mood stabilizers | |||||||
| Post et al. 2006 [40] | 174 | Venlafaxine | 15%; no placebo control | Schaffer et al. 2006 [27] | 20 | Citalopram | Small sample size, no placebo control |
| Truman et al. 2007 [30] | 366 (BPI = 240, BPII = 114) | Paroxetine, bupropion | By self-report only | Fonseca et al. 2006 [28] | 20 | Escitalopram | Small sample size, no placebo control |
| Amsterdam and Shults 2010 [15] | 148 BPII | Fluoxetine | No placebo control, subsyndromal hypomania in 19.6% | Sachs et al. 2007 [29] | 366 (BPI = 240, BPII = 114) | Paroxetine, bupropion | |
| Perlis et al. 2010 [45] | 410 | Olanzapine/fluoxetine combination, lamotrigine | Conducted by Lilly Research Laboratories | ||||
| Sidor et al. 2011 [32] | 1,034 (Meta- Analysis) | Fluoxetine, paroxetine, bupropion, imipramine | |||||