Table 1. Characteristics of prospective studies of red and processed meat consumption and pancreatic cancer riska.
Study, country | Sample size, sex and age | No. of cases | Years of follow-up | Type of meat | RR (95% CI), highest vs lowest category | Adjustments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zheng et al (1993), United States | 17 633 men, ⩾35 years | 57 | 20 | Red meata | 2.4 (1.0–6.1) | Age, smoking index, intakes of energy and alcohol |
Coughlin et al (2000), United States | 1 102 308 men and women, ⩾30 years | 3751 (1967 men, 1784 women) | 14 | Red meata Red meata | 1.1 (0.9–1.2) men 0.9 (0.8–1.0) women | Age, race, smoking history, education, family history of pancreatic cancer, history of gallstones, history of diabetes, BMI, intakes of alcohol, citrus fruits and vegetables |
Isaksson et al (2002), Sweden | 21 884 men and women, NA | 176 | 16 | Pork | 0.25 (0.08–0.81) | Age, sex, smoking, BMI |
Stolzenberg-Solomon et al (2002), Finland | 26 948 men, 50–69 years | 163 | 13 | Red meata Processed meat | 0.95 (0.58–1.56) 1.04 (0.66–1.65) | Age, years of smoking and energy intake |
Michaud et al (2003), United States | 88 802 women, 30–55 years | 178 | 18 | Beef, pork or lamb Processed meat | 0.75 (0.41–1.40) 1.28 (0.86–1.92) | Age, pack years of smoking, BMI, height, history of diabetes, energy intake |
Nöthlings et al (2005), United States | 190 545 men and women, 45–75 years | 482 | 7 | Beef, pork, or lamb Processed meat | 1.45 (1.19–1.76) 1.68 (1.35–2.07) | Age, sex, ethnicity, smoking status, history of diabetes, family history of pancreatic cancer and energy intake |
Larsson et al (2006a), Sweden | 61 433 women, 40–76 years | 172 | 15.3 | Beef, pork, or veal Processed meat | 1.73 (0.99–2.98) 0.94 (0.61–1.44) | Age, education, smoking status and pack years of smoking, BMI, and intakes of total energy, alcohol and folate |
Lin et al (2006), Japan | 105 438 men and women, 40–79 years | 222 (106 men, 116 women) | 9.9 | Beef and porkb Beef and porkb Ham and sausage Ham and sausage | 1.92 (0.95–3.86)b men 1.56 (0.70–3.47)b women 1.82 (0.62–4.26) men 0.93 (0.29–2.99) women | Age, area and pack years of smoking |
Stolzenberg-Solomon et al (2007), United States | 537 302 men and women, 50–71 years | 836 (555 men, 281 women) | 5 | Red meata Red meata Processed meat Processed meat | 1.42 (1.05–1.91) men 0.69 (0.45–1.05) women 1.07 (0.80–1.43) men 0.78 (0.48–1.12) women | Age, education, race, smoking, BMI, history of diabetes and intakes of energy and saturated fat |
Heinen et al (2009), The Netherlands | 120 852 men and women, 55–69 years | 350 | 13.3 | Fresh red meat Processed meat | 0.75 (0.52–1.09) 0.93 (0.65–1.35) | Age, sex, smoking status and number of cigarettes smoked per day and number of years, BMI, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, intakes of energy, alcohol, vegetables and fruits |
Inoue-Choi et al (2011), United States | 34 642 women, 55–69 years | 256 | 16.3 | Red meatb | 0.97 (0.65–1.44) | Age, race, education, smoking, physical activity and alcohol intake |
Abbreviations: BMI=body mass index; CI=confidence interval; NA=not available; RR=relative risk (rate ratio or hazard ratio).
Including processed meat.
Results for beef and pork were combined using a random effects model.