Table 4. Univariate analysis of the factors associated with the frequency of the pH1N1 HA E374K mutants isolated in Taiwan, 2009–2010.
Factors | Numbers of isolates | E374K | Fisher's exact p-values |
A. Epidemic periods | |||
1. pre-peak period of the epidemic * (<Wk 37, before September 13, 2009) | 97 | 9 (9.3%) | |
2. Post-peak period of the epidemic (≧Wk 37, September 13, 2009∼) | 99 | 64(64.7%) | <0.0001 |
B. Class suspension in Taipei City | |||
1. Before suspension intervention (<Wk35, before September 1, 2009) | 63 | 3(4.8%) | |
2. Peak of suspension wave (Weeks 41–45; October 11–November 14,,2009) | 6 | 6(100%) | <0.0001 |
C. Vaccination program intervention | |||
1. Peak-epidemic to pre-vaccination [Peak-Epi-Pre-Vac](Wk 37–43, September 13–October 31, 2009) | 40 | 20(50%) | |
2. During vaccination campaign [D-Vac] (Wk 44–50, November 1–December 19, 2009) | 17 | 15(88.2%) | |
3. Post–national vaccination campaign [Post-Nat- Vac](>Wk 50, After December 20,2009) | 42 | 29(69.%) | 0.017 |
D. Gender Males | 118 | 41(34.8%) | |
Females | 78 | 32(41%) | 0.451 |
E. Age (Years) | |||
1. Pre-peak period of the epidemic | |||
<12 | 45 | 3(6.7%) | |
12–18 | 27 | 4(14.8%) | |
>18 | 25 | 2(8%) | 0.552 |
2. Post-peak period of the epidemic | |||
<12 | 41 | 29(70.7%) | |
12–18 | 18 | 12(66.7%) | |
>18 | 40 | 23(57.5%) | 0.472 |
F. Gender and Age | |||
a) Males <12 | 52 | 21(40.4%) | |
12–18 | 33 | 10(30.3%) | |
>18 | 33 | 10(30.3%) | 0.534 |
b) Females <12 | 34 | 11(32.4%) | |
12–18 | 12 | 6(50%) | |
>18 | 32 | 15(46.9%) | 0.394 |
G. Population density | |||
a) Pre-peak period of the epidemic | |||
1) >20000/km2 | 42 | 9.5%(4/42) | |
2) <20000/km2 | 40 | 7.5%(3/40) | 1 |
b) Post-peak period of the epidemic | |||
1) >20000/km2 | 38 | 25(69.8%) | |
2) <20000/km2 | 28 | 19(67.9%) | 1 |
*: Based on the positive rate detected by RT-PCR or viral culture.