Table 3.
Number* | Data set-3 |
Data set-4 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4095 | 650 | 350 | 280 | 230 | 4095 | 1100 | 610 | 360 | |
Results (%) | |||||||||
79.63 | 87.07 | 91.59 | 91.95 | 92.44 | 82.56 | 89.63 | 91.34 | 92.20 | |
75.98 | 88.17 | 90.49 | 91.46 | 91.83 | 84.51 | 90.12 | 91.10 | 92.80 | |
77.80 | 87.62 | 91.04 | 91.71 | 92.13 | 83.54 | 89.88 | 91.22 | 92.50 |
*Number: number of selected vw Z-curve variables
**The average accuracies of the vw Z-curve methods with 230 parameters for Data set-3 and 360 parameters for Dataset-4, which were the best ones among the algorithms evaluated here, were shown in boldface.