Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 27;40(3):963–971. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr795

Table 4.

Prediction results of all known sigma-factor promoters of B. subtilis using different combination of vw Z-curve features**

Number* Data set-5
Data set-6
4095 872 405 340 4095 740 490
Results (%)
    Inline graphic 80.91 92.73 95.30 95.76 66.97 94.55 98.79
    Inline graphic 81.82 91.97 94.24 95.91 73.03 95.76 99.39
    Inline graphic 81.36 92.35 94.77 95.83 70.00 95.15 99.09

*Number: number of selected vw Z-curve variables.

**The average accuracies of the vw Z-curve methods with 340 parameters for Data set-5 and 490 parameters for Dataset-6, which were the best ones among the algorithms evaluated here, were shown in boldface.