Table 7.
The best recognition results of B. subtilis promoters obtained by different methods (fragments length is 80 bp)*
| Methods | Results (%) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity (Sn) TP/(TP+FN) | Specificity (Sp) TN/(TN+FP) | Average accuracy | Difference between Sn and Sp | |
| Negative samples: coding segments | ||||
| IPMD (8) | 80.4 | 91.3 | 85.85 | 10.9 |
| The proposed method | 95.76 | 95.91 | 95.83 | 0.15 |
| Negative samples: intergenic segments | ||||
| IPMD (8) | 72.6 | 94.5 | 83.55 | 21.9 |
| The proposed method | 98.79 | 99.39 | 99.09 | 0.6 |
*The best average accuracies among the algorithms evaluated here were shown in boldface.