Table 2.
Experiment 2 Paired Comparison Results, z-statistics and p-values collapsed across participants and scenes.
| (1) Retinex | (2) Log Adaption | (3) Photographic tone mapping | (4) Bilateral Filter | (5) Automated Bilateral Filter | Z-stat | P-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 vs. 2 | 166 | 134 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.847521 | 0.064672 |
| 1 vs. 3 | 134 | 0 | 166 | 0 | 0 | −1.84752 | 0.064672 |
| 1 vs. 4 | 114 | 0 | 0 | 186 | 0 | −4.15692 | 3.23E-05 |
| 1 vs. 5 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 220 | −8.0829 | 6.66E-16 |
| 2 vs. 3 | 0 | 108 | 192 | 0 | 0 | −4.84974 | 1.24E-06 |
| 2 vs. 4 | 0 | 138 | 0 | 162 | 0 | −1.38564 | 0.165857 |
| 2 vs. 5 | 0 | 81 | 0 | 0 | 219 | −7.96743 | 1.55E-15 |
| 3 vs. 4 | 0 | 0 | 148 | 152 | 0 | −0.23094 | 0.817361 |
| 3 vs. 5 | 0 | 0 | 110 | 0 | 190 | −4.6188 | 3.86E-06 |
| 4 vs. 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 83 | 217 | −7.73649 | 1.02E-14 |