Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 22;10(4):4083–4099. doi: 10.3390/s100404083

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

(a) Comparison of the response of a SnO2 nanowire, operated at T = 175 °C in dark conditions and at room temperature (T = 25 °C) under UV illumination (Eph = 3.67 ± 0.05 eV, Φph = 30 × 1022 ph/m2s) to a pulse of 5 ppm [30]. (b) Comparison of the sensor response when operated with conventional heating (T = 175 °C) and UV illumination. The selection of the appropriate photon flux leads to sensor performances comparable to those of conventional heated sensors (Reprinted from reference [31] with permission from American Institute of Physics).