Table 3.
Comparison of two sample extraction methods for phytohormone quantification
| Analyte | Sample extraction | Zhonghua 11 | Minghui 63 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration (ng/g)a | P | Concentration (ng/g)a | P | ||
| ABA | crude extraction | 38.53 ± 2.92 | 0.25 | 20.35 ± 1.16 | 0.42 |
| solid-phase extraction | 35.66 ± 0.92 | 21.10 ± 0.85 | |||
| IAA | crude extraction | 3.23 ± 0.40 | 0.55 | 9.91 ± 0.84 | 0.09 |
| solid-phase extraction | 3.06 ± 0.16 | 8.56 ± 0.46 | |||
| JA | crude extraction | 40.78 ± 1.00 | 0.18 | 115.05 ± 9.96 | 0.32 |
| solid-phase extraction | 43.07 ± 2.02 | 122.50 ± 4.40 | |||
| SA | crude extraction | 9221.82 ± 732.65 | 0.61 | 3390.37 ± 807.91 | 0.16 |
| solid-phase extraction | 9512.12 ± 545.10 | 4317.64 ± 291.95 | |||
aEach data point represents mean (3 replicates) ± standard deviation.