Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 14;11:348. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-348

Table 2.

Estimates of incidence of Toxoplasma infections during pregnancy (per 100 pregnancies), 95% confidence intervals in parentheses, separate models in each line

Indirect estimate (Binomial regression model) Direct estimate (Interval censored regression model)
Region/year1) Incidence (first examination)2) Incidence (latest examination)2) Incidence2) Incidence in seronegative women2)

AT311 0.50 (0.37-0.63) 0.48 (0.35-0.62) 0.14 (0.07-0.30) 0.22 (0.11-0.47)

AT312 0.49 (0.43-0.56) 0.48 (0.41-0.55) 0.12 (0.08-0.19) 0.17 (0.11-0.27)

AT313 0.54 (0.41-0.68) 0.49 (0.35-0.63) 0.30 (0.18-0.47) 0.45 (0.28-0.73)

AT314 0.44 (0.31-0.58) 0.44 (0.31-0.58) 0.15 (0.07-0.32) 0.22 (0.10-0.46)

AT315 0.58 (0.47-0.70) 0.51 (0.39-0.63) 0.17 (0.10-0.31) 0.25 (0.14-0.45)

city3) 0.46 (0.37-0.55) 0.43 (0.34-0.52) 0.12 (0.07-0.22) 0.17 (0.09-0.30)

no city4) 0.52 (0.46-0.57) 0.49 (0.43-0.55) 0.18 (0.14-0.24) 0.26 (0.20-0.35)

Total 0.50 (0.46-0.55) 0.48 (0.43-0.52) 0.17 (0.13-0.21) 0.24 (0.18-0.31)

1)NUTS-3 regions [9] and the three biggest cities of Upper Austria

2)incidence is calculated per pregnancy, i.e. per 268-day interval

3)i. e. Linz, Wels, Steyr

4)Upper Austria without Linz, Wels, Steyr