Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Neurosci. 2011 Jun 11;32(1):73–100. doi: 10.1007/s10827-011-0341-0

Table 3.

Single electrode models

Model dcore
(µm)
ϕtip/2
(deg)
dtip
(µm)
htip
(µm)
Atip
(µm2)
ϕshaft/2
(deg)
dshaft
(µm)
hshaft
(µm)
r100µV
(µm)
r50µV
(µm)
r25µV
(µm)
1 24 3.5 2 10 43 5 36 200 92±2 132±3 186±4
2 12 3.5 1.6 10 30 5 36 200 86±2 123 ±3 175±3
3 12 3.5 0.8 3 4 5 36 200 97±0 139±0 201 ±0
4 12 3.5 1 5 8.5 5 65 90 106±2 150±3 217±4
5 7 19 7 10 116 19 65 90 89±4 126±5 179±5
6 12 19 12 16.7 322 19 65 90 85±5 122±5 176±6
7 6 90 6 0 26 19 65 90 97±2 136±1 192±2

M1-M3: sharp tips and shafts; M4-M7: wider shafts and variously sharp tips. The varied geometry parameters included the core diameter (dcore), exposed tip diameter at its top (dtip), exposed tip cone height (htip), cone angle of the shaft (ϕtip), exposed tip area (Atip), shaft diameter (dshaft), shaft cone height (hshaft), the cone angle of the shaft (ϕshaft). Lead field radii are defined at 3 criteria, as in Table 2. Entries are mean ± the half-difference of the radii measured along the horizontal (x-dir) and vertical (z-dir)