Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 3;2(1):e000746. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000746

Table 1.

Contingency tables showing the summary totals in each of the cells after pooling all the junior doctors

Pooled data for the junior doctors
High-prevalence population (77%)
Low-prevalence population (13%)
Reference standard
Reference standard
Positive Negative Positive Negative
Doctor's diagnosis
 Positive 159 22 181 72 50 122
 Negative 10 28 38 24 602 626
 Totals 169 50 219 96 652 748

Note x-rays in the high/low-prevalence population were those interpreted by the radiographer as having a high/low probability of an abnormal feature. The true prevalence is determined by the reference standard.