Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Soc Pers Relat. 2012 Feb 1;29(1):77–101. doi: 10.1177/0265407511406897

Table 1.

Correlation Matrix for Study Variables by Gender1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Mean (W) S.D. (W)

1. Harsh Parenting (w2 – w4) .24 ** .00 .21 ** .12 .21 ** .35 ** .15 * .12 .11 .01 44.81 10.05
2. Community Crime (w2–w4) .12 −.03 .27 ** .08 .19 ** .27 ** .09 .11 −.02 .07 18.30 3.38
3. PC’s marital instability (w2–w4) .03 .07 .00 .01 .07 .12 −.12 −.06 −.01 .04 .72 .87
4. Discrimination (w2–w4) .33 ** .28 ** .01 .01 .10 .19 ** −.04 −.01 .03 −.03 32.89 9.06
5. Financial Hardship (w2–w4) −.15 .00 .13 .14 −.05 .02 .07 .00 .04 −.05 12.01 3.39
6. Insecure Attachment (w 4–w 5) .29 ** .18 * .12 .18 * .22 ** .45 ** .23 ** .24 ** .04 .12 47.22 13.06
7. Hostile Attribution Bias (w4–w5) .21 * .30 ** .22 ** .33 ** .11 .41 ** .12 .14 * .11 .14 3.46 2.18
8. Target Hostility (w 5) .17 * .09 .14 .16 * .06 .15 .23 ** .74 ** .02 .12 7.97 2.32
9. Partner Hostility (w 5) .13 .16 .09 .25 ** .22 ** .25 ** .31 ** .65 ** .07 .16 * 7.81 2.27
10. Negative View of Marriage (w 4) .03 .07 .13 .08 .00 .12 .04 .06 −.02 .26 ** 14.20 2.49
11. Negative View of Marriage (w 5) .08 −.03 .04 .14 .08 .25 ** .12 .33 ** .21 * .16 * 13.28 3.25

Mean (men) 43.75 18.42 .66 35.34 11.57 48.79 3.89 7.67 8.37 13.98 13.23
S.D (men) 7.63 3.88 .86 10.15 3.13 11.69 2.02 2.25 2.69 2.32 3.49
**

p ≤ .01;

*

p ≤ .05,

p<.10 (two-tailed tests)

1

Correlations for women (listwise n = 195) displayed above the diagonal; correlations for men (listwise n = 141) displayed below the diagonal.