Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 8;102(3):407–416. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.01.004

Table 1.

Comparison of simulation results and experimental kinetic parameters for the wild-type or mutated off7 interacting with MBP

Sample Robetta simulation
Single-molecule force microscopy
Surface plasmon resonance
ΔΔGbind (kcal/mol) k0off (×10−3 s−1) xβ (nm) kon (×105 M−1 s−1) koff (×10−3 s−1) Kd (nM)
Wild-type 6.1 ± 2 0.59 ± 0.03 9.41 ± 0.4 7.3 ± 0.5 7.7 ± 0.6
Y125H 0.41 ± 0.03 47.3 ± 9 0.54 ± 0.02 6.14 ± 0.7 25.9 ± 0.8 42.2 ± 4.6
D110A 0.61 ± 0.10 262.8 ± 58 0.43 ± 0.03 2.45 ± 0.2 28.6 ± 1.2 116.7 ± 10.7
Y81A 1.88 ± 0.09 N.B. 0.64 ± 0.1 103.3 ± 7.8 1614 ± 280
F79A 2.79 ± 0.16 N.B. N.B.
W90A 2.74 ± 0.19 N.B. N.B.
E3_5 N.B. N.B.

N.B. represents no binding that is defined as <5 RU response was detected in SPR assay up to 1 μM concentration or <5% of successful binding events observed in single-molecule force microscopy.