Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 11;2011:0211.
Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Maximum/pain-free walking distance

Systematic review
94 people with chronic, stable intermittent claudication
4 RCTs in this analysis
Mean increase in initial claudication distance 3 to 12 months
with exercise programmes
with usual care or placebo
Absolute results not reported

Common difference of the mean (not further defined) 139 metres
95% CI 31 m to 247 m
Effect size not calculated Exercise

Systematic review
409 people
8 RCTs in this analysis
Increase in pain-free walking distance
with supervised exercise therapy
with usual care
Absolute results not reported

WMD 81.29 m
95% CI 35.45 m to 127.14 m
P = 0.0005
Effect size not calculated Exercise

RCT
57 men with stable intermittent claudication Change in pain-free walking distance 12 weeks
From 147 m to 225 m with 12-week supervised arm-crank exercise programme
From 177 m to 192 m with control group

P = 0.03
Effect size not calculated Arm-crank exercise programme

Systematic review
322 people
6 RCTs in this analysis
Mean increase in pain-free walking distance
with exercise
with usual care or placebo
Absolute results not reported

Mean difference 82.19 m
95% CI 71.73 m to 92.65 m
Effect size not calculated Exercise

Systematic review
115 people
5 RCTs in this analysis
Mean increase in absolute claudication distance 3 to 12 months
with exercise programmes
with usual care or placebo
Absolute results not reported

Common difference of the mean (not further defined) 179 m
95% CI 60 m to 298 m
Effect size not calculated Exercise

Systematic review
499 people
9 RCTs in this analysis
Increase in maximum walking distance
with supervised exercise therapy
with usual care
Absolute results not reported

WMD 155.79 m
95% CI 80.84 m to 230.74 m
P <0.0001
Effect size not calculated Exercise

Systematic review
391 people
6 RCTs in this analysis
Mean increase in maximal walking distance
with exercise
with usual care or placebo
Absolute results not reported

Mean difference 113.2 m
95% CI 94.96 m to 131.43 m
Effect size not calculated Exercise

RCT
57 men with stable intermittent claudication Change in maximum walking distance 12 weeks
From 496 m to 661 m with 12-week supervised arm-crank exercise programme
From 600 m to 626 m with control group

P = 0.01
Effect size not calculated Arm-crank exercise programme

RCT
3-armed trial
156 people Increase in walking distance (assessed by a 6-minute walk test; change from baseline) 6 months
+20.9 m with supervised treadmill exercise (3 times/week)
–15.0 m with control

Difference 35.9 m
95% CI 15.3 m to 56.5 m
P <0.001 for treadmill v control
Effect size not calculated Exercise

RCT
3-armed trial
156 people Increase in walking distance (assessed by a 6-minute walk test; change from baseline) 6 months
–2.6 m with resistance training (3 times/week)
–15.0 m with control

Difference +12.4 m
95% CI –8.42 m to +33.3 m
P = 0.24 for resistance training v control
Not significant
Walking time

Systematic review
255 people
7 RCTs in this analysis
Mean change in walking time
136 minutes with exercise
119 minutes with usual care or placebo

WMD 5.12 minutes
95% CI 4.51 minutes to 5.72 minutes
Effect size not calculated Exercise

RCT
4-armed trial
52 people with intermittent claudication Increase in walking duration from baseline 6 months
From 804 seconds to 2020 seconds with pole-striding exercise plus placebo
From 612 seconds to 623 seconds with placebo

P value not reported for pole-striding v placebo