Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 21;2011:0813.
Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Adverse effects

Systematic review
599 women with moderate to severe pain
14 RCTs in this analysis
Adverse effects
with NSAIDs
with placebo

RR (NSAIDs [analysed as a group] v placebo) 1.29
95% CI 1.05 to 1.59
However, no significant difference between any 1 NSAID and placebo
Small effect size placebo

RCT
Crossover design
5-armed trial
104 women with primary dysmenorrhoea Adverse effects
with ibuprofen arginate 200 mg
with ibuprofen arginate 400 mg
with ibuprofen 200 mg
with ibuprofen 400 mg
with placebo
Absolute results not reported

Reported as no significant difference between active treatments and placebo
Not significant

RCT
Crossover design
3-armed trial
73 women with moderate to severe primary dysmenorrhoea Incidence of adverse effects
12% with etoricoxib
25% with naproxen sodium
15% with placebo
Absolute numbers not reported

Significance assessment not performed

RCT
Crossover design
3-armed trial
73 women with moderate to severe primary dysmenorrhoea Headache
1.5% with etoricoxib
7.5% with naproxen sodium
4.5% with placebo
Absolute numbers not reported

Significance assessment not performed

RCT
Crossover design
3-armed trial
73 women with moderate to severe primary dysmenorrhoea Nausea
3% with etoricoxib
3% with naproxen sodium
1.5% with placebo
Absolute numbers not reported

Significance assessment not performed

RCT
Crossover design
4-armed trial
144 women with moderate to severe primary dysmenorrhoea Proportion of people reporting adverse effects
23% with naproxen
13% with placebo
Absolute numbers not reported

Significance assessment not reported

RCT
Crossover design
3-armed trial
149 women aged between 18 and 44 years, with primary dysmenorrhoea Adverse effects
40/129 (31%) with celecoxib
46/126 (37%) with naproxen sodium
38/127 (30%) with placebo

RCT
3-armed trial
180 women with primary dysmenorrhoea Adverse effects
with mefenamic acid
with placebo