Ref (type) | Population | Outcome, Interventions | Results and statistical analysis | Effect size | Favours |
All-cause mortality | |||||
[63]
Systematic review |
4525 people 8 RCTs in this analysis |
Rate of mortality
3 to 24 months
436/2262 (19%) with amiodarone 507/2263 (22%) with placebo or conventional treatment |
ARR 3.0% 95% CI 0.8% to 5.3% RR 0.86 95% CI 0.76 to 0.96 |
Small effect size | amiodarone |
[64]
Systematic review |
6553 people 13 RCTs in this analysis |
Rate of annual mortality
mean follow-up of 16 months
11% with amiodarone 12% with placebo or conventional treatment Absolute numbers not reported |
Fixed effects model OR 0.87 95% CI 0.78 to 0.99 Random effects model OR 0.85 95% CI 0.71 to 1.02 The effect of amiodarone was significantly greater in RCTs comparing amiodarone versus usual care than in placebo-controlled RCTs |
||
[64]
Systematic review |
6553 people 13 RCTs in this analysis |
Rate of arrhythmic death or sudden death
mean follow-up of 16 months
with amiodarone with placebo or conventional treatment Absolute results not reported |
OR 0.71 95% CI 0.59 to 0.85 The effect of amiodarone was significantly greater in RCTs comparing amiodarone versus usual care than in placebo-controlled RCTs |
Small effect size | amiodarone |
[64]
Systematic review |
1452 people with heart failure 5 RCTs in this analysis Subgroup analysis |
Rate of annual mortality
mean follow-up of 16 months
20% with amiodarone 24% with placebo or conventional treatment Absolute numbers not reported |
OR 0.83 95% CI 0.70 to 0.99 The effect of amiodarone was significantly greater in RCTs comparing amiodarone versus usual care than in placebo-controlled RCTs |
Small effect size | amiodarone |