TABLE I.
Fitted Models
| Cluster | spikes | SNR | fit | k | β0 | βe | βv |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1612 | 3.01 | hP,iP | – | 7.97 | −0.696 | 0.23 |
| 2 | 1633 | 3.10 | hP,iP | – | 8.22 | 0.151 | 0.171 |
| 3 | 380 | 11.0 | hIG,iIG | 0.888 | −5.57 | 7.80 | 4.60 |
| 4 | 521 | 12.5 | iIG | 1.23 | −3.88 | 9.13 | 5.41 |
| 5 | 1482 | 3.32 | iP | – | 7.40 | 3.08 | 1.87 |
| 6 | 399 | 3.75 | hP,iP | – | −2.66 | 2.17 | 0.485 |
| 7 | 857 | 3.14 | hP,iP | – | 2.39 | 0.491 | 0.500 |
| 8 | 413 | 3.58 | hP,iP | – | −2.65 | 3.05 | 1.33 |
| 9 | 604 | 3.87 | hP,iP | – | −0.247 | 3.36 | 1.74 |
Fitting of the spike train of each spike cluster to the four distributions (iIG, hIG, iP, hP). For each spike cluster we report: (a) the number of spikes (column 2); (b) the SNR (column 3); (c) which ones of the four models pass the K-S test, i.e., the corresponding K-S plot lies within the acceptance bounds (column 4); and (d) the parameters of the inhomogeneous model passing the K-S test (columns 5 to 8).