Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 8;7(2):e31382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031382

Table 3. Exponential random graph coefficients of an elephant association network showing that the elephant network had a sparse density of associations, a strong clustering, a strong association by raiding status and a weak association by age (n = 58 elephants).

Independent variables Estimated value Standard error t-ratio Probability value
Density of associations −5.297 1.343 0.025 0.000
Transitivity (AT-T) 1 0.606 0.105 0.068 0.000
Reciprocal associations 4.781 0.564 −0.029 0.000
AinAoutS (Alt-in-alt-out-star) 6.357 1.322 −0.049 0.000
1inAoutS (1-in-alt-out-star) 1.745 0.681 0.034 0.011
Ain1outS (Alt-in-1-out-Star) −5.243 0.722 −0.044 0.000
Source node 1.678 1.037 0.076 0.106
AinS (Alt-in-Star) 0.241 0.971 0.054 0.804
Association by raiding status 0.672 0.319 0.019 0.035
Association by age 2 −0.027 0.010 −0.024 0.007
Reciprocity of associations based on raiding status −0.251 0.670 −0.022 0.708
1

Transitivity parameter indicates clustering and a schematic representation of this and other parameters in this table are shown in Figure S1.

2

Data on age differences between dyads was used to test whether associations in the network are based on age proximity in this analysis.