Table 3. Exponential random graph coefficients of an elephant association network showing that the elephant network had a sparse density of associations, a strong clustering, a strong association by raiding status and a weak association by age (n = 58 elephants).
Independent variables | Estimated value | Standard error | t-ratio | Probability value |
Density of associations | −5.297 | 1.343 | 0.025 | 0.000 |
Transitivity (AT-T) 1 | 0.606 | 0.105 | 0.068 | 0.000 |
Reciprocal associations | 4.781 | 0.564 | −0.029 | 0.000 |
AinAoutS (Alt-in-alt-out-star) | 6.357 | 1.322 | −0.049 | 0.000 |
1inAoutS (1-in-alt-out-star) | 1.745 | 0.681 | 0.034 | 0.011 |
Ain1outS (Alt-in-1-out-Star) | −5.243 | 0.722 | −0.044 | 0.000 |
Source node | 1.678 | 1.037 | 0.076 | 0.106 |
AinS (Alt-in-Star) | 0.241 | 0.971 | 0.054 | 0.804 |
Association by raiding status | 0.672 | 0.319 | 0.019 | 0.035 |
Association by age 2 | −0.027 | 0.010 | −0.024 | 0.007 |
Reciprocity of associations based on raiding status | −0.251 | 0.670 | −0.022 | 0.708 |
Transitivity parameter indicates clustering and a schematic representation of this and other parameters in this table are shown in Figure S1.
Data on age differences between dyads was used to test whether associations in the network are based on age proximity in this analysis.