Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 9.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Nutr Metab. 2002;46(0 1):24–30. doi: 10.1159/000066399

Table 1.

Child nutritional indicators and psychosocial functioning measures pre-USBP1

Total
n (%)
97 (100)
Energy and nutrient intake adequate, n (%)
68 (70)
Energy and/or 2+ nutrients <50% RDA low, n (%)
29 (30)
School breakfast participation
 Mean 29.6 (41.4) 36.3 (42.9) 13.8 (33.4)b
 Rarely 59 (61) 35 (59) 24 (41)
 Sometimes 15 (16) 14 (93) 1 (7)
 Often 23 (24) 19 (83) 4 (17)b

Parent report
 CCHIP total score 1.2 (2.2) 0.6 (1.8) 2.5 (2.6)e
 Not hungry 70 (72) 59 (84) 11 (16)
 At risk 18 (19) 5 (28) 13 (72)
 Hungry 9 (9) 4 (44) 5 (56)e

Child report
 CHI-C total score 0.7 (1.4) 0.5 (1.3) 1.2 (1.5)a
 Not hungry 68 (70) 55 (81) 13 (19)
 At risk 12 (12) 4 (33) 8 (67)
 Hungry 17 (18) 9 (53) 8 (47)d

PSC parent report
 Total score 14.1 (9.8) 12.0 (7.9) 19.2 (12.2)d
 PSC non-case 87 (91) 67 (77) 20 (23)
 PSC case 9 (9) 1 (11) 8 (89)d

PSC youth report
 Total score 19.8 (9.9) 18.5 (9.0) 22.7 (11.3)a
 Non-case 83 (86) 62 (75) 21 (25)
 Caseb 14 (14) 6 (43) 8 (57)b

School record measures
 GPA 2.6 (0.8) 2.8 (0.7) 2.1 (0.8)d
 Reading 2.5 (0.9) 2.6 (0.8) 1.9 (0.9)c
 Math 2.4 (1.0) 2.7 (0.6) 1.7 (0.9)d
 Social studies 2.7 (0.7) 2.6 (0.8) 2.3 (0.9)c
 Science 2.8 (0.9) 2.9 (0.8) 2.4 (0.8)c
 Days absent 7.8 (7.7) 6.5 (5.4) 11.5 (11.3)b
 Days tardy 2.9 (5.2) 1.9 (3.0) 5.7 (8.2)b
a

p < 0.10;

b

p < 0.05;

c

p < 0.01;

d

p < 0.001;

e

p < 0.0001.

1

Mean school breakfast participation: number of days eating school breakfast divided by days attended.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure