Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 9.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Nutr Metab. 2002;46(0 1):24–30. doi: 10.1159/000066399

Table 2.

Changes in nutritional risk and child outcome measures post-USBP1

Nutritional Status
Total
n (%)
97 (100%)
Worse
n (%)
17 (18)
No change
n (%)
62 (64)
Improved
n (%)
18 (19)
Categorical change in school breakfast
Decrease in breakfast rate 19 (20) 8 (42) 11 (58) 0 (0)
No change in breakfast rate 34 (35) 5 (15) 25 (74) 4 (12)
Increase in breakfast rate 44 (45) 4 (9) 26 (59) 14 (32)c

Mean change in school breakfast rate (SD) 21.3 (52.0) −11.0 (59.5) 20.2 (47.6) +55.8 (38.8)b

Hunger
 CHI-C mean hunger score change −0.3 (1.2) +0.3 (1.0) −0.2 (0.9) −1.4 (1.5)d

PSC
 Youth report change −1.5 (7.3) +1.9 (5.9) −2.0 (7.4) −3.2 (7.6)c

School record measures
 Overall GPA change mean (SD) −0.1 (0.5) −0.1 (0.4) −0.1 (0.4) 0.0 (0.8)
 Reading −0.2 (0.8) −0.2 (0.6) −0.2 (0.5) −0.3 (1.3)
 Math +0.2 (0.8) +0.0 (1.1) +0.1 (0.7) +0.6 (0.6)b
 Social studies −0.3 (0.8) −0.3 (0.6) −0.2 (0.5) −0.3 (1.3)
 Science −0.1 (0.8) 0.0 (0.9) −0.1 (0.7) +0.1 (1.0)
 Days absent −1.3 (5.9) +3.0 (4.7) −1.7 (6.0) −4.4 (4.6)c
 Days tardy +0.1 (6.2) +2.2 (4.9) −0.3 (6.5) −2.7 (5.4)
a

p < 0.10;

b

p < 0.05;

c

p < 0.01;

d

p < 0.001;

e

p < 0.0001.

1

Mean school breakfast participation: number of days eating school breakfast divided by days attended.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure