. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: Psychol Trauma. 2012 Jan 1;4(1):9–21. doi: 10.1037/a0018743

Table 3.

Bootstrap Analysis of the Magnitude and Statistical Significance of Indirect Effects for Mediation Model

Independent Variable	Mediator Variable	Dependent variable	β standardized indirect effect	B mean indirect effect^a	SE of mean^a	95% CI mean indirect effect^a (lower and upper)
Social Support→	Psychological Distress→	Subjective Health	(-.103) × (.286) = -.030	-0.019	0.006	-0.034, -0.009
Resource loss→	Psychological Distress→	Subjective Health	(.345) × (.286) = .099	0.030	0.004	0.022, 0.039
Exposure→	Psychological Distress→	Subjective Health	(.148) × (.286) = .042	0.120	0.029	0.066, 0.182
Sex (female)→	Psychological Distress→	Subjective Health	(.170) × (.286) = .049	0.099	0.022	0.058, 0.144
Age→	Psychological Distress→	Subjective Health	(.095) × (.286) = .027	0.002	0.001	0.001, 0.004

Note. Exposure = Exposure to Political Violence. CI = confidence interval.

These values are based on unstandardized path coefficients. Resource loss = psychosocial resource loss. All indirect effects are significant at p < .01.