Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Trauma. 2012 Jan 1;4(1):9–21. doi: 10.1037/a0018743

Table 4.

Bootstrap Analysis of the Magnitude and Statistical Significance of Indirect Effects for Alternative Mediation Model

Independent Variable Mediator Variable Dependent variable β standardized indirect effect B mean indirect effecta SE of meana 95% CI mean indirect effecta (lower and upper)
Resource loss → Subjective Health → Psychological Distress (.133) × (.415) = .055 0.114 0.743 0.055, 0.178
Sex (female)→ Subjective Health → Psychological Distress (.114) × (.415) = .047 0.656 0.656 0.290, 1.115
Education→ Subjective Health → Psychological Distress (-.107) × (.415) = -.044 -0.268 -0.268 -0.446, -0.114
Income→ Subjective Health → Psychological Distress (-.161) × (.415) = -.067 -0.570 -0.570 -0.812, -0.364
Age→ Subjective Health → Psychological Distress (.381) × (.415) = .158 0.087 0.087 0.067, 0.114

Note. Exposure = Exposure to Political Violence. CI = confidence interval.

a

These values are based on unstandardized path coefficients. Resource loss = psychosocial resource loss. All indirect effects are significant at p < .01.